When I see "Additionally, the insertion of members of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) beginning in January 2025 pose a potential threat to the integrity of the closely safeguarded chemical terrorism vulnerability information (CVI) that was collected in furtherance of CFATS from the private sector."
At that point you lost all credibility with me. The USDS team has been vetted and has already covered far more sensitive data than this.
The CVI data that the CSI was talking about is all of the information about security systems at over 3,000 high risk chemical facilities. I would argue that there is no more sensitive information outside of the classified information files in the government.
When I see "Additionally, the insertion of members of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) beginning in January 2025 pose a potential threat to the integrity of the closely safeguarded chemical terrorism vulnerability information (CVI) that was collected in furtherance of CFATS from the private sector."
At that point you lost all credibility with me. The USDS team has been vetted and has already covered far more sensitive data than this.
The CVI data that the CSI was talking about is all of the information about security systems at over 3,000 high risk chemical facilities. I would argue that there is no more sensitive information outside of the classified information files in the government.
Again, this is a team that has already been vetted for accessing sensitive information. That argument simply doesn't hold water.